September 1-15, 2006
Volume 14 - Number 15
$1

Prolétaires de tous les pays, unissez-vous!
Otatoskewak ota kitaskinahk mamawestotan!
Workers of all lands, unite!

*  *  *  *  *

CONTENTS
1. Defeat the drive to war, defeat the Harper government
2. Peace in Lebanon, but US prepares for war on Iran
3. CUPW speaks out on crisis in the Middle East

4. Harper Tories should resign, says CPC
5. Hargrove re-elected, CAW takes "New Direction"
6. "What comes next?" asks CAW

7. Council of Canadians slams new sellout
8. Farmers hit by crisis - Editorial
9. Hands off the Wheat Board!
10. Support family farms - defend Canada's food sovereignty
11. Parity price bill needed - Letter to Editor
12. The Revolution is here to stay - Editorial
13. Bringing labour history to the classroom
14. Pressure mounts for Mexican recount
15. Israel, oil and the demolition of Lebanon
16. Bengal rallies condemn anti-worker policies

17. Chilean workers protest over pay
18. Tim Buck: Canada's communist

19. What's Left
Podcast of People's Voice Articles

Clarté (en français)

*  *  *  *  *
People's Voice

Canadian Publications Mail Sales Product Agreement #205214
ISSN number 1198-8657
People's Voice is published by:
New Labour Press Ltd:
706 Clark Drive,
VANCOUVER, B.C. V5L 3J1
Phone:604-255-2041
Fax:604-254-9803
email:  pvoice@telus.net

Editor: Kimball Cariou
Editorial Board: Kimball Cariou, MiguelFigueroa,
Doug Meggison, Naomi Rankin, Liz Rowley, Jim Sacouman
* * * * * *
Letters
People's Voice welcomes your letters
on any subject covered in our pages.
We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity,
and to refuse to print letters which may be libellous
or which contain unnecessary personal attacks.
Send your views to:
"Letters to the Editor",
796 Clark Dr., Vancouver, BC V5L 3J1,
or pvoice@telus.net
People's Voice articles may be reprinted without permission,
provided the source is credited.


* * * * * *

Send me information on the Communist Party of Canada.

The Communist Party of Canada, formed in 1921,
has a proud history of fighting for jobs, equality, peace,
Canadian independence, and socialism.
The CPC does much more than run candidates in elections.
We think the fight against big business and its parties
is a year-round job,
so our members are active across the country,
to build our party and to help strengthen people's movements
on a wide range of issues.

All our policies and leadership
are set democratically by our members.
To find out more about Canada's party of Socialism,
give us a call at the nearest CPC office.

* * * * * *
Central Committee CPC
290A Danforth Ave Toronto, Ont. M4K 1N6
Ph: (416) 469-2446
fax: (416) 469-4063 E-mail info@cpc-pcc.ca

Parti Communiste du Québec
3961 Av. Barclay, App. 4
Montréal, H3S 1K9
E-mail: pueblo@sympatico.ca

B.C.Committee CPC

706 Clark Drive, Vancouver, V5L 3J1
Tel: (604) 254-9836
Fax: (604) 254-9803

Edmonton CPC
Box 68112, 70 Bonnie Doon P.O.
Edmonton, AB, T6C 4N6
Tel: (780) 465-7893
Fax: (780)463-0209

Calgary CPC
Unit #1 - 19 Radcliffe Close SE
Calgary  AB, T2A 6B2
Tel: (403) 248-6489

Regina CPC
P.O. Box 482, Regina, SK S4P 2Z6

Ottawa CPC
Tel: (613) 232-7108

Manitoba Committee
387 Selkirk Ave., Winnipeg, R2W 2M3
Tel/fax: (204) 586-7824

Ontario Ctee. CPC
290A Danforth Ave., Toronto, M4K 1N6
Tel: (416) 469-2446

Hamilton Ctee. CPC
265 Melvin Ave., Apt. 815
Hamilton, ON.
Tel: (905) 548-9586

Atlantic Region CPC
Box 70 Grand Pré, NS, B0P 1M0
Tel/fax: (902) 542-7981

http://www.communist-party.ca/

* * * * * *
News for People, Not for Profits!
Every issue of People's Voice
gives you the latest
on the fightback from coast to coast.
Whether it's the struggle for jobs or peace, resistance to social cuts,
solidarity with Cuba, or workers' struggles around the world,
we've got the news the corporate media won't print.

And we do more than that
- we report and analyze events
from a revolutionary perspective,
helping to build the movements for justice and equality,
and eventually for a socialist Canada.

Read the paper that fights for working people
- on every page, in every issue!

People's Voice
$25 for 1 year
$45 for 2 years
Low-income special rate: $12 for 1-year
Outside Canada $25 US or $35 Cdn for 1 year

Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave.,
Toronto ON M4K1N6

(Home)




Defeat the drive to war, defeat the Harper government

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

Labour Day Statement by Sam Hammond, Chair of the Central Labour Commission, Communist Party of Canada


IN THE NEAR FUTURE future and for a long time to come, the Canadian labour movement, the peace movement and the social justice Movements will look back on 2005 as a very dangerous year. Whether 2006 and our future overshadow 2005 and get worse is yet to be seen. This depends on the Canadian working people and their democratic institutions, especially labour.

     Let's go back to the spring of 2005. The unelected business elites of Canada, Mexico and the USA organise a nice little group called the Independent Task Force for North America. Our misfortunes were represented by former Deputy Prime Minister John Manley. This tri-national group issued a "Call for a North American Economic and Security Community" by 2010 - a call for a united continental bloc to share energy, immigration, law enforcement and security.

     In March of 2005 Prime Minister Martin, President George Bush and Mexican President Vicente Fox signed the "Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement" which is literally the blueprint for "deep integration" of Canada and Mexico into the US. Each leader assigned a cabinet minister to work in an implementation group. David Emerson was assigned by Martin, and that is why George Bush probably told Harper to recruit him to the Tory cause and give him his old post. His primary role might transcend government altogether the span between parties. The interesting phenomenon is that his nimble footwork was strictly organizational. His moral and philosophical turpitude was quite in tune to both Liberal and Tory machinations for the dismantling of Canadian sovereignty. There are working groups busy in all three countries fine tuning the Security and Prosperity Partnership Agreement in preparation for implementation. These people will shape our future and they are neither elected nor identified.

     These grand plans for continentalism are a tangible expression and the instruments of managing a once sovereign state that has already been penetrated by foreign ownership to the tune of 37% in 2003. This just didn't happen. It is part of a process that began in earnest in the early sixties, was slowed considerably by public pressure during the Trudeau years and took off again with Mulroney, continued under Martin and is absolutely soaring under "Steve" Harper. Most developed countries consider 10% foreign ownership to be effectively foreign control. The burning question for Canadians isn't if we're under foreign control, it's at which level are we and is it possible to reverse a trend that is being escalated almost daily by the Stephen Harper Tories.

     If this is viewed as a process, then the last federal election and the massive media and corporate support for Stephen Harper was merely an act of implementation. The Martin Liberals were too vulnerable to public opinion. They hesitated on Star Wars publicly while acquiescing behind the scenes. Not good enough. The Canadian Council of Chief Executives (largely executives of foreign owned corporations) only recognize on-your-knees grovelling to US policy. One blink is disloyalty. Deep integration, a common border, an expanded US dominated military, US controlled cross-border movement, US dominated continental intelligence, "Homeland" security and US dominated cross-border law enforcement are the agenda. Harpers role is to deliver the bacon.

     Every vital sector of manufacturing, extraction, transportation, print media, telecommunications, energy and natural resources is by now experiencing significant foreign control, with full foreign ownership looming. The role of the Harper Tories is to finalize a militarized branch plant economy, with our traditional social programs, our social safety net either eliminated or out sourced to private foreign corporations. Imagine the working people of Canada suffering and super exploited under the heel of a borderless corporate oligarchy using continental police and unlimited electronic surveillance.

     We already have a large dose of the contempt for democratic governance possessed by the Harper government. We have gone from peace-keeping to war with no act of parliament. Our foreign policy has been fundamentally changed to partnership and integration with the aims of imperialism and its American Bushite war plans. If anyone wants to see what Harper has in store for those who resist, just compare the glorification of soldiers killed serving US interests in Afghanistan with the contempt shown to a Canadian soldier murdered by Israeli forces, because he and other UN observers were in the way, witnesses to Israeli war crimes. Harper's policy of war and militarization will be financed by the plunder of our social programs, the giveaway of our resources and broken promises to the First Nations. War creates death and poverty. Foreign policy will be mirrored by domestic policy, and the police forces and the military will implement at home eventually what they implement in Afghanistan and Haiti.

     In a minority government, why has there been no rebellion? Why is resistance so timid? Where are the voices of anger? Who the hell is minding the store?

     The Canadian Labour Congress has spoken unflinchingly on Afghanistan. Bring the troops home, get out of the US war machine. CUPE Ontario has spoken bravely and stubbornly against the US-Zionist military agenda, against occupation of Arab lands and murder of Arab people. CUPE fights for the scores of UN resolutions and thus fights also for the UN as a needed institution. The CLC and CUPE are not alone in the labour movement. Rather they represent the antidote for the political sickness inflicted on us. If the antidote doesn't come from the organized section of the working people, the labour movement, then who?

     Many workers today are searching for answers and this often produces an introspective as well as a militant stance. Some want to concentrate on shop floor issues, contracts and wages, quality of life and maintenance of standards. Not surprising when the generation-spanning struggle it took to get a few crumbs from the capitalist table is remembered so well.

     This is not in itself a danger to militancy. Sometimes to hold the line is the only way to prepare alternatives. Stubborn defence is every militant worker's agenda. It is only dangerous when it becomes the only agenda because in time every defence will be penetrated. Defence is valuable as a launching platform for an aggressive agenda with the ability to create a social dynamic serving the interests of working people.

     The convention resolutions, the analyses, the framework of a fight back movement already exists in the central labour bodies of both English-speaking Canada and Quebec. They exist in one form or another in the policies of most unions in Canada. But how can they be implemented? How can they be injected as a guide and a catalyst for the peace and social justice movements, as the binding factor of unity and solidarity? The answer is mass action. Massive political action outside parliament. Massive campaigning to save medicare, to withdraw from imperialist war plans, to win child care, to save our resources and create jobs. A social dynamic that will swell the ranks of labour, bring in thousands of new members and raise the level of social consciousness of the entire non-corporate population. We are talking of a Tory defeat in the next federal election. This can be done if the determination to do it is there.

     The pre-requisite is a higher level of unity in the labour movement. This means consciously putting aside irritants that feed disunity. Raiding across sectors, absence from central labour bodies, opportunism, collaboration, etc. We all know what divides and what heals. This is a process of mending that will create large young and progressive elements in the labour movement, that will weld the membership and the leadership into a common purpose, use the instrument of inclusive democracy. What is needed is a labour movement that can pull all the democratic and people's movements into a social dynamic that will defend our country and address the future. A business as usual "wait and see" attitude, fighting only on the corporate ground where media and money will determine the outcome is a blueprint for disaster. The Tory defeat in the next election must be the result of street level campaigning that starts now, that resists the drive to war, the sale of our resources, the destruction of our social programs and the dismantling of medicare. The Communist Party calls on organized labour to take up this task, to take its programs and experience back to the streets.

     Years ago in the yards surrounding slaughterhouses there were long winding mazes of fencing where the doomed animals were herded from the rail cars to the killing floor. They could smell the death and danger in the air. In order to control them it was necessary to get another animal to lead them through the maze to their doom, an animal they thought was one of them. This despicable being was usually a goat, known as a Judas Goat. At this time and place Stephen Harper is the Judas Goat of Canadian Politics. He must not succeed. The Canadian people need their labour movement as never before.








Peace in Lebanon, but US prepares for war on Iran

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

By Darrell Rankin

AFTER A MONTH of criminal "shock and awe" bombings and a stalled ground war by Israel in Lebanon, U.S. President Bush and the Israeli government accepted what could be a temporary peace arrangement in the U.N. Security Council on August 11.

     Despite powerful anti-war protests and anti-imperialist resistance, it is increasingly clear that the ceasefire must be used to prepare for greater unity and actions to block more dangerous imperialist aims.

     Tens of thousands of people protested against supporters of Israeli war crimes such as Prime Minister Stephen Harper. As the war continued, the Communist Party of Canada called for Harper's resignation and all opposition parties started to reflect the popular opposition to Harper.

     Israel planned the war for at least two years with the full approval of the U.S. Launched to demolish any hope for ending its occupation of Palestinian territories, and to advance U.S. strategic aims in the Middle East, the war has backfired.

     The war gave popular forces courage and energy throughout the world to resist imperialism and realize justice. Calls are growing for a boycott of the racist, expansionist state of Israel. More people are becoming aware of the broader imperialist danger.

     The war and Israel's butchery in the occupied territory of Gaza may be a prelude to a far "greater" war - a massive U.S. onslaught against Iran and possibly Syria with the ill-conceived aim of crushing all resistance in a re-shaped "new" Middle East, looting the oil resources and bolstering U.S. imperialist hegemony.

     This is a futile and extremely dangerous strategy that would mark a further turn in foreign policy to fascist-like solutions for the serious impasses of U.S. imperialism, adding to pressures for reactionary crackdowns in the U.S. and its allies.

     A growing chorus of commentators, intelligence experts, U.S. military officers, the Israeli government and "sources" close to the Bush administration declare that the imminent target is Iran, viewed by U.S. imperialism and Israel alike as the main obstacle and backer of resistance forces in the region.

     The far-right Bush administration agreed to a ceasefire in the following circumstances: a fierce and united resistance in Lebanon that won support among anti-imperialist forces everywhere and made pro-U.S. regimes more unpopular; signs of a growing Israeli opposition to the war; growing calls for a ceasefire (Arab League, Non-Aligned Movement of one hundred countries, some NATO countries, including a protest of 100,000 people in London and other massive protests around the world).

     Without a doubt, Lebanon's resistance forces are being celebrated throughout the country and beyond for defeating the Israeli ground invasion, which until August 8 went no further than three kilometers. The victory was paid for by resistance fighters, by hundreds of civilians who died from Israeli air and artillery massacres, and by those who will die prematurely from a destroyed economy and from Israeli cluster bombs that now cover much of South Lebanon.

     But it is not clear that Bush was forced to accept a ceasefire. Rather, U.S. imperialism led by the far-right Bush administration can equally justify the ceasefire as a convenient pause before attacking Iran. U.S. forces are now on alert and ready to destroy over 10,000 targets in Iran almost simultaneously.

     A leading commentator, Seymour Hersh, writes that "some officers serving the (U.S.) Joint Chiefs of Staff remain deeply concerned that the (Bush) Administration will have a far more positive assessment of the air campaign than they should" (New Yorker, August 21).

     With absolutely no evidence and complete hypocrisy, the U.S. and Israel, which have thousands of nuclear weapons, are accusing Iran of intentions to develop and use nuclear weapons. Iran insists it aims only to develop nuclear power, a right enjoyed by all members of the United Nations.

     Iran is widely expected to reject a United Nations Security Council resolution demanding that it abandon its nuclear programs by August 31. If Iran ignores the resolution, the Security Council could impose sanctions, which would be completely unjustified and contrary to the U.N. Charter and other basic principles of international law.

     In short, imperialism would have once again influenced the U.N. Security Council to impose sanctions that could be as deadly as those endured by Iraq from 1991 to 2003. France, China or Russia may veto such sanctions.

     The danger is that the U.S. will consider any "failure" by the U.N. to act against Iran as a green light for a pre-emptive war and regime change. As humanity mourns the many hundreds of dead in this latest conflict, we must prepare for new mobilizations to block the preparations by the U.S. for yet another war.

     This struggle is also increasingly linked to the defence of democratic freedoms. In one shocking development, some Zionist organizations in Canada have demanded police repression of anti-war demonstrations, taking the so-called "war on terror" to new extremes.

     Despite this, the anti-war movement is growing, and the CLC continues to make opposition to the Afghan debacle a priority. Every effort is needed to build on this trend, including the October 28 Canada-wide day of action against the occupation of Afghanistan.








Hargrove re-elected, CAW takes "New Direction"

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

PV Vancouver Bureau

     Buzz Hargrove was elected by acclamation to another three-year term as CAW President at the union's August 15-18 convention in Vancouver. Challenger Willie Lambert, a member of CAW Local 1256 and a well-known Ontario labour activist, dropped out of the race on the convention's second day.

     Hargrove has led the CAW since 1992, when he took over from Bob White. In his acceptance speech, Hargrove said his goal over his final term will be to maintain a tough, militant collective bargaining agenda as well as strong advocacy on social justice and community activism.

     CAW national secretary-treasurer Jim O'Neil and CAW-TCA Quebec director Luc Desnoyers were also re-elected. Other members of the union's National Executive Board include trustees Christine Connor (Local 414), Bill King (Local 597), and Evelyn Sy (Local 2169). Nancy McMurphy of Local 302 was elected to the Member at Large position.

     The most dramatic debate at the convention focused on the proposal for a new and independent direction in electoral politics, one which Hargrove calls issue-based rather than party-based. The policy papers advancing the concept contain sharp criticisms of the growing social inequality and other problems facing Canadian working people, and advocate many progressive reforms.

     Many observers have noted that by encouraging voters to vote Liberal in most federal ridings, Hargrove and the CAW have thrown considerable support to a big business party which has implemented neoliberal policies and greatly undermined Canadian sovereignty for most of its recent history.

     Speaking at the conclusion of the debate, Hargrove said his suspension by the Ontario NDP for supporting "strategic voting" in the last federal election was an attack on the entire union. CAW Council delegates voted last December in favour of supporting NDP candidates who had a strong chance of winning, and in other cases supporting the candidate with the best chance of defeating the Conservative. The result was to back the Liberals in most ridings.    "We will never accept as a union that the party will tell us what to do," Hargrove said. He went on to blast the Ontario Federation of Labour, to which the CAW is no longer affiliated, for (in his view) refusing to seriously discuss the ideas and proposals raised by the largest union in that province.

     The delegates voted almost unanimously in support of a new "CAW Statement of Principles on Working Class Politics," which stresses "independent, democratic and participatory" political activism by the union.

     Referring to the role of the NDP, CAW Local 444 financial secretary Gary Parent that getting candidates elected is not enough unless they serve the needs of working people, their families and communities. Like other speakers, he criticized the NDP in Ontario for attempting to make CAW members choose between their union and the party, since "the NDP will lose every time."








Council of Canadians slams new sellout

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

     The Council of Canadians (CoC) has condemned yet another assault on Canada's independence, even while Prime Minister Harper was grandstanding to the media in the Arctic, supposedly on a mission to defend Canadian sovereignty.

     A CoC release dated August 15 reported that "According to the U.S. Department of State, the North American Competitiveness Council (NACC) met in Washington today to find ways `to cut red tape or eliminate unnecessary barriers to trade in North America,' and to set priorities for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP)."

     "Corporations such as Lockheed Martin, Wal-Mart, Suncor and Chevron should not be shaping economic policy between Canada and the United States," said Jean-Yves LeFort, trade campaigner with the Council of Canadians. "The North American Competitiveness Council gives far too much power to business leaders who are clearly more interested in profit than in what's best for Canada."

     The CoC notes that Prime Minister Stephen Harper named ten corporate executives to the NACC at a meeting of North American leaders in Cancun, Mexico last March. Nine of those ten appointees represent corporations that are members of the powerful Canadian Council of Chief Executives (CCCE), whose North American Security and Prosperity Initiative led to the signing of the SPP by Canada, Mexico and the U.S. in March 2005.

     The CCCE campaigns for the integration of the Canadian and U.S. economies, the harmonization of our foreign, security and immigration policies, as well as common environmental, health and other regulations. In a meeting this past March, the U.S. branch of the NACC set five clear objectives for the SPP, including "energy integration," and "private sector involvement in border security."

     "Harper and Bush have clearly given business leaders the green light to press forward on a North American model for business security and prosperity," warned Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians. "How truly accountable is the Harper government to the Canadian people when it gives preferential treatment to the big-business community in the design of its policies."

     "During the elections, Harper promised to submit any 'significant international treaty' to a vote in Parliament," said LeFort. "It is his duty to make Canada's `security and prosperity' a matter of public debate."
 







Farmers hit by crisis - Editorial

(The following editorial is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

PV Editorial, Sept. 1-15, 2006

After being elected in part with strong rural support, the Harper Tories are carrying out measures that will deepen Canada's severe farm crisis. For example, Harper is preparing to chop the Canada Wheat Board, which would mean a huge windfall for the giant grain companies.

     The backlash is already underway. Harper was put on notice at an April 5 rally in Ottawa, where 10,000 farmers demanded steps to address the record losses in net farm income, which reached historic lows for the last two years.

     The Tories have promised a "cost of production" income program for farmers. But without curbing the monopoly powers of the large agribusinesses, government assistance going into a farmer's pocket will be robbed by corporations charging more for supplies or paying less for farm produce. Until this cost-price squeeze is addressed, nothing important will change for farmers.

     During the past ten years, from 1995 to 2005, the average Canadian farm earned negative $323, far less than the worst years of the Great Depression when the average Canadian farm had a net income of $3,897. At the same time, a survey of 75 agri-companies showed that in 2004 profits reached a record high, and 76 per cent had their best or nearly their best year. (See "The Farm Crisis & Corporate Profits," issued last November by the National Farmers Union.)

     As farmers are forced off the land, most join the ranks of wage-earners in cities and in rural areas, giving employers a stronger hand in their efforts to drive down wages and break unions. It's in the interests of the labour movement to join hands with Canada's farmers to resist this trend, starting with pressure on Ottawa to preserve the Wheat Board.


Hands off the Wheat Board!

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)


Statement from the Central Executive Committee, Communist Party of Canada, August 16, 2006


The Harper government's shutting down the Canadian Wheat Board would be a serious blow to family farmers and to Western Canada as a whole. The plan should be opposed by farm, labour and other people's movements across Canada through united, powerful protests that will ensure Harper is blocked in Parliament from carrying out this serious threat.

     The CWB itself was created as a result of mass protests by farmers in Western Canada before the Second World War who experienced the crushing monopolistic practices of the grain corporations. Half a century later, the Harper Tories are acting for these same monopolies that have become even larger, with a handful dominating the global grain market.

     These giant grain monopolies want to chop the Wheat Board so they can fleece the vast majority of wheat farms which are still family-owned. The big, wealthy farmers calculate they will be enriched, but the grain monopolies care nothing about the development of Western Canada's agriculture and their policies will instead create a broad farm crisis by throwing thousands of farmers off the land.

     It is a plan that will benefit no-one except a handful of the largest grain monopolies. It won't help workers and their families in cities, it won't help rural workers and it certainly won't help the large majority of family farms.

     The CWB acts on behalf of 80,000 farmers in western Canada to achieve the best price for wheat, durum and barley and for railway shipments. Against this record of achievement, the Harper Tories are orchestrating an expensive media and lobby campaign to "sell" their plan.

     The CWB saves farmers over $800 million per year and for that reason enjoys the respect and support of the vast majority of wheat farmers who year after year elect a large majority of pro-CWB directors. Preparing to shut down the Board, the Tories may try to manipulate that support by listening to proposals from a committee appointed last year to review how farmers elect board members.

     The review panel proposed to ban smaller wheat farmers as voters (producers with less than 40 tonnes in two years) and to ban directors from speaking to media or publicly representing the Board during CWB elections. Supporting these anti-democratic proposals would show the Harper Tories as the true party of big business they are.

     It is important to realize that eliminating the CWB would mean handing marketing control of a large part of Canadian wheat to U.S.-based corporations and strike another major blow to Canadian sovereignty.

     Support for the CWB remains strong among the democratic and anti-monopoly sections of western farmers, such as the National Farmers Union. Now is the time for the labour movement to strengthen unity with such forces, to help protect the family farm as a bulwark of Canadian sovereignty and food self-sufficiency. This will help to build a firm labour-farmer alliance and to achieve a promising future for Canada, its farmers and workers.

The Revolution is here to stay - Editorial

(The following editorial is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

PV Editorial, Sept. 1-15, 2006

News of President Fidel Castro's successful surgery has lifted the spirits of all who recognize Cuba's valiant role in the global struggles for peace and social progress. We wish a full recovery for Fidel, and a speedy return to his responsibilities as the head of the Cuban state.

     Meanwhile, the ghoulish celebrations by ultra-right circles in Florida quickly fell flat. We have a message for these terrorist forces and their Washington backers: the Cuban Revolution will not falter when Fidel passes into history.

     The story of Latin America is full of outstanding heroes, from Simon Bolivar to Jose Marti in the past, to Luis Emilio Recabarren, Che Guevara, and Salvador Allende and many more during the 20th century. In nearly every country of Latin America, revolutionary struggles have challenged imperialism's brutal oppression and plunder, but in most cases, Yankee imperialism and its local ruling elites have ultimately crushed or subverted these movements.

     Until now. The Cuban Revolution has proven that fundamental social transformation is a real alternative to capitalist exploitation in our hemisphere. Even more significant, Cuba has defended its Revolution in the face of a crippling U.S. boycott and innumerable plots to destabilize and overthrow its democratically elected leadership. With powerful support among the working class and peasants, the main social base of any revolutionary government, Cuba's socialist system will survive and flourish in the wake of any leadership change in the future.

     This is especially true given the sweeping advances by left and progressive forces across the region. Cuba is no longer largely isolated; it is part of an emerging alliance of countries which stand for social progress, democratic renewal, and defence of national sovereignty. Fidel's contribution to this process is his greatest legacy, one which will continue to transform our hemisphere in the decades ahead!








Bringing labour history to the classroom

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

By Wayne Madden

     IN ELEMENTARY GRADES, Social Studies curricula tell how corporations and business made this country great. However, precious little is told about the role of working people.

     For example, the Alberta grade four Social Studies curriculum has a great deal to say about the role of the Hudson's Bay Company in the fur trade, most information showing the company in a positive light. However, only a little is told about how First Nations people were induced to sell valuable furs in return for "goods" that were either destructive (e.g. liquor) or valueless (glass beads). Nothing is told about how the couriers who carried loads of furs weighing over 100 kg leading to early deaths in their thirties from strangulated hernias, how their wives died in childbirth and how their children often died as a result of unsafe and unhealthy living conditions.

     Teaching history is a passion for me. I teach the curriculum faithfully, but find opportunities to share stories of working people and class struggle. While elementary school is too early to present a political message on class struggle, children at this age have a built in sense of adventure and a passion for fairness. These traits provide opportunities for teachers to create awareness in children about past and present contributions of working folk. Right from the start of the school year, I find many opportunities to tell the stories from the point of view of workers. The fur trade is one example, but there are more.

     The grade four curriculum in Alberta includes discussion about lifestyles when Alberta and Saskatchewan became provinces. I tell about how children had to quit school and work in dangerous conditions in coal mines and factories to bring money for their families. I remind them this is one reason laws were developed to end child labour. To give a global perspective, I discuss how child labour is still used in many parts of the world to produce material goods they use. For many children, the Nike "swoosh" no longer seems quite so attractive after this lesson.

     The early years of the century were also a time of immigration. While telling about the rich contributions of the Ukrainian settlers to Canadian culture, this is also the time I tell about internment of Ukrainian settlers during World War I.

     Curriculum and textbooks tell about the Depression and how people had to "ride the rods" in the search for work. Then the curriculum goes on to tell about heroic contributions of men and women to the war effort.

     What is lacking is quality information on the relief camps, the On-to-Ottawa trek, attacks on workers in Regina and Estevan, and the bravery of the MacKenzie-Papineau Battalion in the fight against fascism in Spain. So, I tell these stories. The bravery of the Mac-Paps also leads into World War II. While telling about sacrifices and bravery of Canadians during that war, I also tell about how suffering caused by punitive peace treaties after World War I and failures of governments to take fascism seriously made World War II inevitable.

     Of course there are also special days in which elementary teachers can discuss and celebrate the contributions of working people.

     Labour Day is not one of those days. Whether school starts before or after Labour Day, children are focused on telling about vacation adventures, getting to know their new teacher, reconnecting with friends and settling in to routines. While teachers should remind students of the reason for that holiday, do not expect much information to settle in.

     Better days are the Day of Mourning for Workers Killed on the Job (April 28th) and May Day.

     On April 28th, school flags should be at half mast. If so, I draw children's attention to this fact, and then tell how canaries were once put down into mines to be sure they were safe. Children will feel sorry for the birds, but this sets the stage to tell how the lives of workers are often at risk. We talk about recent examples of workers have been killed or injured at work: police and fire services workers, accident victims at local oilsands operations, victims of mine tragedies, and students who have been victims of school shootings. Children learn these workers are not just "other people". They are moms, dads, brothers and sisters. Suddenly, children realize someone they love could be killed at work. Worker safety becomes important for them.

     If April 28th is a sad day, May 1st is a day of celebration. Discuss how our lives are better because of the contributions of workers. This is a good time to review material taught in history, showing how our lives are better because of working people. We talk about how much easier it is to travel or communicate and how these advances involved great sacrifices from workers. Since I teach in a Catholic public school, I draw attention to the fact that May 1st is also the Feast of St. Joseph the Worker. I tell about how Joseph, a carpenter who supported his family, encouraging children to talk about the work their parents do to support them.

     Now with all this, I have not presented any political message that can bring trouble from parents and administrators who do not want politics in the classrooms. However, I have raised consciousness by presenting a more complete history that includes contributions by working people. As they get older, students will be able to use this information and understand why defending workers' rights is essential to democracy. This topic can be explored in older grades when issues of globalism, economics and political systems are studied.

     (The author is an Alberta teacher.)


Pressure mounts for Mexican recount

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

By Tim Pelzer

WITH TIME RUNNING OUT before Mexico's Federal Electoral Tribunal declares a presidential winner, evidence keeps mounting of widespread fraud during the July 2 elections. Not only are authorities ignoring growing public pressure to recount the vote, but they have attacked opposition protestors.

     Six officials from the Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) - the body that organized the July 2 elections - in the state of Sinaloa recently stated that 40% of acts (vote tallies of each polling station) as well as the final vote count have mathematical flaws. IFE officials in six other states have also voiced similar criticisms. In the state of Veracruz, the National Action Party (PAN) is threatening legal action against six IFE officials who have criticized the July 2 elections.

     The recent recount of 9.7% of polls, undertaken by the Federal Electoral Tribunal, revealed widespread irregularities. While the tribunal has not released any official results, IFE reported that PAN lost votes in 24% of polls recounted while the Coalition increased its vote in 16%, and 63% of polls had vote totals that differed from those of the acts (vote tallies in each poll).

     Observers from the leftist coalition For the Good of All - composed of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD), the Workers Party and Convergence - who were present at the recount reported that in the 11,839 (out of 130,000) polling places where it took place, judges discovered: there were 58,056 more votes cast than there were people who actually voted; ballot boxes had illegally been opened and tampered with; votes for coalition candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador had not been counted; PAN presidential candidate Felipe Calderon was credited with 14,847 more votes than he should have been. In 31% of the 11,839 polling stations there were 61,688 missing votes.

     Lopez Obrador's coalition maintains that the partial vote recount confirms the legitimacy of its demands that all votes be recounted to rule out fraud. The coalition vowed to continue with its campaign of peaceful disobedience to pressure authorities to recount the vote. The coalition also announced that it would present evidence to the Tribunal that cybernetic fraud also played a role in awarding Calderon a false victory. Calderon's brother-in- law Diego Zavala's company Hilderbrando supplied the software that IFE used to compute the final vote results.

     On the other hand, Calderon, the presidential candidate backed by the Bush administration, stated that the vote recount reflects few irregularities. Calderon accuses Lopez Obrador of not respecting the voters wishes and wanting to annul the elections.

     Given the falsifications found, the coalition has asked the tribunal to annul the 11,839 polling place vote totals that were counted. In these polls, Calderon won 1.8 million votes against 800,000 for Lopez Obrador. If the tribunal rules in favour of annulling the polls, and these votes are subtracted from each candidate, Lopez Obrador will be the winner.

     On Aug. 21 the tribunal begins evaluating votes that were not clearly marked, with the goal of deciding who to award the votes to. The Tribunal is also currently resolving disputes in the elections for the Senate and Chamber of Deputies. The judicial body has until Sept. 6 to declare its final results and choose a president.

     However, some analysts doubt the Federal Electoral Tribunal's ability to make an independent decision on the vote count. A source in Mexico's intelligence services said in an interview that four of the seven judges on the tribunal "respond to the interests of Calderon." In addition, the government of President Vicente Fox was able to pressure the tribunal into not ordering a full vote recount, telling judges that their post-retirement careers would go nowhere if they made the wrong decision. Six of the seven judges are set to retire from the tribunal next year, their terms coming to an end, stated the source, who maintains that the Fox government rigged the elections.

     The Mexican TV network Televisa showed a video August 14 of IFE officials illegally opening, altering and mixing up election materials in this city's District 5 on July 11. Another videorecording was released shortly after showing ballot boxes in six electoral districts that have been illegally opened and altered, including torn up and unfolded ballots that suggest ballot box stuffing. These videos have strengthened Lopez Obrador's charges that illegal tampering with the vote took place.

     Lopez Obrador's supporters are camped out in front of IFE offices across Mexico, where ballot boxes are stored under military guard, to prevent IFE officials from tampering with ballot boxes.

     Meanwhile, thousands of people remained camped out on streets in downtown Mexico City, their numbers growing daily. Farmers in nearby states are delivering food to the protesters. Lopez Obrador's supporters, in peaceful actions, continue to disrupt operations of large businesses that financially support PAN, which refuses to recount the vote. These businesses are also spending millions of dollars on television commercials arguing against a vote recount.

     On Aug 14, federal police and the presidential high command broke up a protest camp composed of Lopez Obrador supporters outside the Chamber of Deputies in Mexico City. Using batons and tear gas, they injured 30 protestors, 15 of whom were deputies and senators belonging to the leftist PRD.







Israel, oil and the demolition of Lebanon

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

By Mike Whitney, from Information Clearing House. Written prior to the recent ceasefire, this article has been abridged.

"The raw logic of Israel's distorted self-image and racist doctrines is exposed beyond confusion by the now-stark reality: the moonscape rubble of once-lovely Lebanese villages; a million desperate people trying to survive Israeli aerial attacks as they carry children and wheel disabled grandparents down cratered roads; limp bodies of children pulled from the dusty basements of crushed buildings. This is the reality of Israel's national doctrine, the direct outcome of its racist worldview." (Virginia Tilley, "The Case for Boycotting Israel" in Counterpunch).

     By bombing the highways and main bridges into Beirut, Israel has cut off the capital from the outside world and put the entire nation under siege. Israel can now execute its plan to pummel Lebanon into rubble without the threat of foreign intervention.

     The north has been effectively severed from the south allowing the IDF (Israeli Defence Force) to continue its ethnic cleansing operations as well as its search-and-destroy missions for Hezbollah fighters. They have meticulously destroyed all the main points of entry at the Syrian border and blockaded the coastline. Israel believes that their earlier occupation (which ended in year 2000) failed due to the unrestricted flow of supplies and weaponry from Syria and Iran. The Bush administration has assisted this effort by providing crucial intelligence about the movement of material from the outside.

     By now, it should be apparent that Israel's military campaign has nothing to do with Hezbollah's capturing of the two Israeli soldiers on July 14. The present plan, which was drawn up more than a year ago (and on which high-ranking members of the Bush administration were fully briefed) is designed to establish a new northern border for Israel at the Litani River and create an "Israel-friendly" regime in Beirut.

"Greater Israel"

     The plan to annex the land south of the Litani River dates back to the founding of the Jewish state when Israel's first Prime Minister David Ben Gurion described the country's future borders this way: "To the north the Litani River, the southern border will be pushed into the Sinai, and to the east, the Syrian Desert, including the furthest edge of Transjordan."

     In 1978, the IDF launched Operation Litani with the intention of annexing the southern part of Lebanon and setting up a Christian client-regime in Beirut that would take orders from Tel Aviv. Israel said that it needed a "buffer zone" for its security, the same excuse that it uses today. The 1982 invasion devolved into an 18-year onslaught which ravaged the Lebanese economy and killed more than 20,000 civilians. In 2000, Israel was driven from Lebanon by the persistent attacks of the Lebanese resistance organisation, Hezbollah.

     The media portrayal of the current conflict is blatantly absurd. It has nothing to do with "captured soldiers" or Israel's "right to defend itself". This is a traditional war with clear territorial and political objectives. The border controversy is nonsense. Israel is trying to seize more land to realise its vision of "Greater Israel" while reducing an adjacent Arab country to a "permanent state of colonial dependency".

     This explains the vast and deliberate destruction to Lebanon's civilian infrastructure. Israel's dominance requires that its neighbours endure abject poverty and oppression. By destroying the infrastructure and life-support systems, Israel hopes to eliminate the rise of a potential rival as well as to diminish the ability of the Lebanese resistance to wage war against the Jewish state.

     Once Lebanon is decimated, it will be delivered to the World Bank which will apply the shackle of reconstruction loans and structural readjustment, which will keep Lebanon as an indentured servant to the global banking establishment. This model of economic servitude has been used throughout the developing world with varying degrees of success. It anticipates Israel's regional ascendancy while ensuring that Lebanon's sovereignty will be compromised for decades to come.

US fully engaged partner

     The United States has played a unique role in Israel's war on Lebanon. In its 230-year history the US has never deliberately assisted in an attack on an ally. That record will end with Lebanon.

     Lebanon's government was demonstrably "pro-American", on friendly terms with Washington. In fact, American NGOs and intelligence organisations helped to activate the "Cedar Revolution" which gave rise to the Fouad Siniora Government and the eventual expulsion of Syrian troops. To a large extent, Washington and Tel Aviv had achieved what they wanted to by meddling in Lebanon's political affairs. The country was singled out as a shining example of Bush's "global democratic revolution", which was the stated goal of American intervention in the Middle East.

     Lebanon has since been rewarded for its cooperation by the total obliteration of its economy and infrastructure. The Bush administration has abandoned any pretence of being an "honest broker" and is now providing Israel with precision-guided missiles to prosecute a war against a (mainly) civilian population. They are also actively collaborating with the Olmert regime to foil all plans for an immediate ceasefire.

     The United States is a fully-engaged partner in the premeditated destruction of a democratic country. It is as much a part of the Israeli aggression as any IDF tank commander rumbling towards Beirut.

What does Israel want?

     The only way that Israel can maintain its dominance in the region is by becoming a main-player in the oil-trade. Otherwise it will continue to be dependent on the United States to strengthen its military and defend its interests. Israel's determination to "stand on its own two feet" is outlined in the neocon plan for "rebuilding Zionism" in the 21st century - "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". The document is the blueprint for redrawing the map of the Middle East and eliminating rivals to Israeli power.

     Most of the attention has been focused on the parts of the paper which presage the attacks on Iraq, Lebanon and Syria; including this ominous passage:

     "Securing the Northern Border: Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil. An effective approach, and one with which America can sympathise, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran, as the principle agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: paralleling Syria's behaviour by establishing the precedent that Syria is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces striking Syrian military targets in Lebanon, and should that prove to be insufficient, striking at select targets in Syria proper." ("A Clean Break"; Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser).

     Clearly, this is the basic schema for US/Israeli aggression in the region. What has been overlooked, however, is Israel's determination to "break away" from its traditional dependence on American support. As stated in the text:

     (Israel intends to) "forge a new basis for relations with the US - stressing self-reliance, maturity, strategic cooperation on areas of mutual concern, and furthering values inherent to the West. This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform. Israel can make a clean-break from the past and establish a new vision for the US-Israeli partnership based on self-reliance, maturity, and mutuality - not one narrowly focused on territorial disputes. (Israel) does not need US troops in any capacity to defend it, and can manage its own affairs.

     "Such self-reliance will grant Israel greater freedom of action and remove a significant lever of pressure used against it in the past. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace it seeks. When Israel is on sound footing, and is free, powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it".

     Israel's "economic freedom" depends in large part on its ability to become a central petroleum-depot for the global oil trade. In Michel Chossudovsky's recent article "Triple Alliance: US, Turkey, Israel and the War on Lebanon" (July 2006), the author provides a detailed account of the alliances and agreements which underscore the current war. As Chossudovsky says, "We are not dealing with a limited conflict between the Israeli Armed Forces and Hezbollah as conveyed by the Western media. The Lebanese War Theatre is part of a broader US military agenda, which encompasses a region extending from the Eastern Mediterranean into the heartland of Central Asia. The war on Lebanon must be viewed as `a stage' in this broader `military road map'".

Reshaping the Middle East

     Chossudovsky shows how the recently completed Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline has strengthened the Israel-Turkey alliance and foreshadows an attempt to establish "military control over a coastal corridor extending from the Israeli-Lebanese border to the East Mediterranean border between Syria and Turkey."

     Lebanese sovereignty is one of the unfortunate casualties of this Israel-Turkey strategy.

     Most of the oil from the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline will be transported to Western markets but, what is less well-known, is that a percentage of the oil will be diverted through a "proposed" Ceyhan-Ashkelon pipeline which will connect Israel directly to rich deposits in the Caspian. This will allow Israel to supply markets in the Far East from its port at Eilat on the Red Sea. It is an ambitious plan that ensures that Israel will be a critical part of the global energy distribution system.

     Oil is also a major factor in the calls for "regime change" in Syria. An article in the UK Observer, "Israel Seeks Pipeline for Iraqi Oil", notes that Washington and Tel Aviv are hammering out the details for a pipeline that will run through Syria and "create an endless and easily accessible source of cheap oil for the US guaranteed by reliable allies other than Saudi Arabia." The pipeline "would transform economic power in the region, bringing revenue to the new US-dominated Iraq, cutting out Syria, and solving Israel's energy crisis at a stroke."

     The Israeli Mossad is already operating in northern Iraq where the pipeline will originate and have developed good relations with the Kurds. The only remaining obstacle is the current Syrian regime which has already entered the US/Israeli crosshairs. The Observer quotes a CIA official who said, "It has long been a dream of a powerful section of the people now driving this administration and the war in Iraq to safeguard Israel's energy supply as well as that of the US. The Haifa pipeline was something that existed, was resurrected as a dream, and is now a viable project - albeit with a lot of building to do."

     Former US ambassador James Atkins added, "This is a new world order now. This is what things look like particularly if we wipe out Syria. It just goes to show that it is all about oil, for the United States and its ally."

     The Middle East is being reshaped according to the ideological aspirations of Zionists and the exigencies of a viciously competitive energy market. Behind the bombed-out ruins of Qana and the endless sorties laying Lebanon to waste, are the tireless machinations of the energy giants, the corporate media, the banking establishment and Israel.

     Don't expect a quick return to peace. This war is just beginning.
 







What's Left

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

VANCOUVER, BC

StopWar.ca meetings - to plan anti-war actions and Oct. 28 protest against Canadian occupation in Afghanistan, 5:30 pm, Aug. 9 and 23, Maritime Labour Centre, 111 Victoria Drive. See stopwar.ca for info.

Left Film Night - 7 pm , Sunday, September 24 at the Dogwood Centre, 706 Clark Drive screening "People's History of the United States" DVD. Free admission, donations welcome, call 604-255-2041 for details.

TORONTO, ON

Campaign for Public Education Summit -  Sunday, Sept. 24, 10 am - 2 pm, North York Civic Centre, 5100 Yonge St. Meet CPE-endorsed school trustee candidates at this campaign platform launch. For info, visit the CPE website: http://www.campaignforpublic-education.ca.

Celebrate 85 years of struggle -  social marking the Communist Party's anniversary, Sat., Sept. 30, cocktails 6:30, dinner 7:30, at 300 Bloor St. W. Guest speakers, four-course meal with vegetarian option, cultural program, displays, cash bar, live music and dancing. For info and tickets, call  CPC Ontario Ctee. at 416-469-2446.

MONTREAL, QC
Young Communist League School - Sept. 1-4, on Marxism and building the youth and student movements in Quebec. Info: quebec@ycl-ljc.ca

Vigil against occupation of Palestine -
Every Friday, noon to 1 pm, at Israeli Consulate, corner of Peel and Rene Levesque. For info: Palestinians and Jews United, 961-3928.

REDS ON THE WEB
http://www.communist-party.ca







CUPW speaks out on crisis in the Middle East

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

The following statement was issued by Canadian Union of Postal Workers National President Deborah Bourque, before the ceasefire which halted the conflict in Lebanon and Gaza:

CUPW's policy on war states "War and militarism cause death, grief, hardship and suffering for innocent people all around the world." This rings horribly true in the current escalation of the conflict in the Middle East.

More than 1,000 lives have been lost since the Israeli military offensive began in Gaza and Lebanon, most of them innocent Lebanese and Palestinian civilians.

The death of Canadian United Nations Peacekeeper, Paeta Hess-von Kruedener, hits particularly close to home, as his sister is a Montreal postal worker and union activist. Our deepest sympathy goes out to her and her entire family.

At the same time, we need to condemn Israeli actions which led to this unnecessary death.

Working people bear the brunt of most conflicts, and this one is no exception. It is workers and their families in Lebanon and Palestine and Israel who are being killed. It is workers in Lebanon and Palestine and Israel who are victims of the diversion of economic and social resources to military uses.

As a union representing public sector workers, CUPW is particularly upset with the bombing of infrastructure in Gaza and Lebanon. It is workers who built and maintained this infrastructure, and it is workers who are the most affected by the loss of roads, public utilities, schools and hospitals. And it is their workplaces that have been turned into military targets.

It is even more disturbing that this destruction is deliberate and intended to prevent humanitarian aid from being distributed in Lebanon. In fact, Israel announced that anyone that attempted to repair destroyed bridges and roads would be targets.

CUPW is deeply disturbed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's lack of a balanced view on this issue. His statements do nothing to solve the conflict, and only serve to inflame it. Both Israel and Hezbollah are to be condemned for targeting citizens and civilian infrastructure. But Israel's attack on Lebanon is not a "measured response".

We are calling on Prime Minister Harper to retract his statements and to call for an immediate ceasefire, the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon and humanitarian aid to Lebanon.

Please contact the Prime Minister and your Member of Parliament immediately and take part in rallies and demonstrations in your communities.

Solidarity,
Deborah Bourque, National President








Harper Tories should resign, says CPC

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

A statement from the Communist Party of Canada shortly before the recent cease-fire put forward the following demands:
  • an immediate cease-fire and halt to all military actions, followed by the complete withdrawal of all Israeli forces from Lebanon and Gaza;
  • the release of all prisoners taken during the current offensive, including the elected Palestinian parliamentarians and government Ministers taken by the IDF in Gaza;
  • that Israel be held accountable for its blatant war crimes during this aggression and forced to provide full compensation to Lebanon and the Palestinian Authority for all human and material losses suffered as a direct result of its aggression..
The statement went on to say:
". . .This crisis has shown once again the true face of the Harper Tories - their close ties with U.S.-based energy transnationals, and their willingness to accelerate the sell-out of Canadian sovereignty. Harper and his government do not speak for most Canadians who want our country to be an active voice for world peace, not more war and aggression. in so doing, they have lost any right to govern, and should resign. . .

"The roots of this latest tragedy are to be found in longstanding policies of the Israeli government based on the expansionist and racist ideology of Zionism, regardless of the sufferings and dislocation of its neighbouring Arab peoples and states. In achieving these ends, the state of Israel has continually thumbed its nose at international law, and with the help and protection of U.S. imperialism, has rejected dozens of United Nations resolutions which could form the basis for a just and lasting political settlement of the Middle East conflict.

"Successive Israeli governments have seized Palestinian lands and built the 'separation wall' which was ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice. The IDF routinely detains and tortures Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, assassinates activists and leaders, and destroys homes, clinics and schools. Israel is trying to strangle the elected Hamas government, and brazenly declares its right to unilaterally determine the final borders by annexing Palestinian lands into "Greater Israel."

"The only just solution that can guarantee genuine and enduring peace in the region must be based on UN resolutions demanding an end to Israel's illegal occupation of all territories, including East Jerusalem, seized in the 1967 war; the establishment of a viable and genuinely independent Palestinian state; guaranteeing the right of return for all Palestinian refugees; and recognizing and developing co-operative relations with a truly independent and sovereign Palestinian state. There is no other 'road map' to genuine and lasting peace in the region.

"In order to pressure Tel-Aviv and its imperialist allies to accept such a lasting and just peace, the time has now come for the world to impose sanctions and a full boycott against the rogue state of Israel."







"What comes next?" asks CAW

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

For the interest of PV readers, here is an excerpt from the CAW convention paper titled "In the Eye of the Storm: The CAW and the Re-Making of Canadian Politics". The full document is available on the union's website, http://www.caw.ca

The election of the Harper government, its early success in implementing its agenda (despite having only a minority mandate), and the risk that it may soon win a majority, present the labour movement and all progressive Canadians with an urgent and dangerous challenge. Given the near unanimous and energetic support for Harper being expressed by Canadian corporate leaders, a majority Conservative government would clearly usher in a harsh period of unforgiving corporate rule...

Trying to prevent this chain of events must be the top priority of progressive movements in Canada over the coming months. This will be a historic challenge, made all the harder by the intense disunity on the left coming out of the last election.

Representatives of the labour movement and other progressive movements must work quickly to determine where we can find common ground in the fight against Harper. The continuing focus of the NDP on attacking the Liberals (who are still viewed as their main enemy) does not help, either. Nevertheless, all progressives have a clear common interest in limiting Harper's victories under the minority government, and highlighting the costs and dangers of his right-wing vision.

The next steps are clear:
  1. We must offer all possible support to issue-specific campaigns aimed at limiting the Harper government's actions in the present minority government. Top priorities include the child care campaign, the fight to preserve Canada's commitment to Kyoto, the fight to save the Kelowna Aboriginal accord, the fight to stop the Canada-Korea free trade agreement, and the movement to limit Canada's military involvement in Afghanistan.
  2. We must work to build stronger links, and where possible common campaigns and messages, between the various issue-specific fightbacks... The CAW commits to supporting broader social movements and fight-back coalitions as a key priority of our political strategy.
  3. We also need to begin thinking about possible strategies for the next election... Each party can be expected, once again, to put its own short-term electoral interests ahead of the broader need to stop Harper and protect crucial progressive values. It will be left to more independent progressive forces (including the CAW, and other movements which are not beholden to a particular party) to imagine ways out of this electoral "box." Options here might include some form of electoral cooperation in selected ridings between the Liberals and the NDP; nominating joint candidates in selected ridings; or else a more focused and detailed effort to encourage voters to stop the Conservatives in specific ridings. In the long-run, of course, working for electoral reforms (such as proportional representation) would help to avoid the sort of voting quandary that assisted the Conservatives so much in the recent election. In the short-run, however, we have to imagine how to attain the best possible results within our current, flawed system.
  4. The Liberal leadership contest will be an important political event in coming months, and there are stark differences between the candidates on several important issues. It is important for all progressive movements that the next Liberal leader support more progressive positions on crucial issues (such as child care, Kyoto, taxes, and the war in Afghanistan)...
In all of these cases, the CAW's interventions will continue to reflect our fundamental political principles: namely, that working people and their allies can exert real, collective influence over our political evolution, in ways that advance their interests (and those of their families and communities). And the union can play a leading role in organizing that collective action, so long as its efforts are independent, democratic, and reflective of the concrete concerns and priorities of union members.







Support family farms - defend Canada's food sovereignty

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

From the Communist Party of Canada's 2006 election platform:

  • Ensure Canada's food sovereignty through policies that benefit family farms, such as lower rail freight rates and curbing the power of the agro-industrial monopolies with price controls to reduce the cost of farm inputs.
  • Expand or reestablish single-desk selling for more crops and livestock through the Wheat Board and similar marketing agencies.
  • Increase food safety inspections.
  • Set price controls on staple foods, including in Northern and remote communities.
  • Impose strict environmental controls on all "factory" farms and ban in-ocean fish farming and deepsea draggers.
  • Support organic farming; reduce the use of antibiotics, fertilizers, pesticides, and other potentially harmful farm inputs.

        (Contents)
(Home)







Parity price bill needed - (Letter to Editor)

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

The North American economy cannot restore itself through the free trade market forces alone, because the free market system today does not function due to the concentrated power of raw materials marketing conglomerates.

In order to put the economy back on track we must enact a new law. Farmers confuse the Canadian Wheat Board with these conglomerates against which the Wheat Board must compete for sales. The Wheat Board and supply management marketing is the only market system that is on the farmer's side of the market. Getting rid of the Wheat Board or castrating its monopoly selling desk by making it a dual market, or softening rules on tariffs for supply managed market boards, would throw all farmers to the wolves as the conglomerates in the open markets are in a monopolistic buying position, and as such control the price ever downward for their own benefit.

The Wheat Board is the exact opposite. It places farmers in position as single desk sellers.

From 1910 to 1914 and 1942 5o 1952 we had parity price bills in place for raw materials producers. The new Law we must enact is a parity price bill for raw materials, especially for family farmers, as their well-being also affects the well-being of the rest of society. The only way it could be done is through an agency like our Canadian Wheat Board and Supply Managed Marketing boards. Before we dismantle the single desk seller - the Canadian Wheat Board - we still have a chance to choose whether we will enact a parity law or not. Our grandchildren will not have that chance to choose.

R.E. Kennedy
Simpson, Saskatchewan







Bengal rallies condemn anti-worker policies

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year. Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

Thousands of rallies, marches and meetings were organised across Bengal on August 10 by the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) to condemn the anti-worker policies of India's central government. Swelling the ranks of their comrades working in the organised sector were hundreds and thousands of unorganised workers.

The speakers at the rallies pointed to the onerous attacks organised on workers in such places as Gurgaon in Haryana, Chamera in Himachal Pradesh, and Ferozabad in Uttar Pradesh. They also noted the fervent pro-worker, pro-poor, and pro-people stand of the Left Front government of Bengal state.

Shyamal Chakraborty, President of the Bengal unit of the CITU, warned that the working class would never in any circumstances give up their rights earned through long and arduous struggles, which will continue "in ever widening circles." Chakraborty and CITU Bengal secretary Kali Ghosh congratulated the workers for making the day-long programme an unqualified success.

(B. Prasant, INN)







Chilean workers protest over pay

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

Workers at the world's largest privately-owned copper mine in Chile downed tools on August 7 to demand a 13% pay increase and a bonus of 16 million pesos ($29,100 US). The Escondida mine is majority-owned by mining giant BHP Billiton, which earlier this year was forced to recognize a union at its Ekati diamond mine in northern Canada.

The workers argue that a recent surge in global copper prices means that their pay demands can easily be afforded. But BHP Billiton claims that the price trend is "temporary" and is unrelated to the mine or workers productivity.

BHP Billiton has declared "force majeure", giving it legal protection and letting it miss contracted agreements, such as delivery of copper concentrate as a result of the slump in production. The Escondida mine, north of the capital Santiago, produces about 8% of the world's copper, and daily production has dropped by almost two-thirds because of the strike.

BHP Billiton owns 57.5% of the Escondida mine, with rival Rio Tinto holding 30%. Copper prices soared to record highs this year, boosting Escondida's net profit to $2.9 billion in the first half of 2006.

"Yesterday (August 16) they told us, 'this is all we're going to give, take it or leave it,'" Pedro Marin, spokesman for more that 2,000 striking workers, told the media. Marin said workers were disappointed that the company was not coming back with a counter offer after the union moderated its demand for a raise in salary to 10 percent from 13 percent. He said they would ramp up protests and demonstrations.







Tim Buck: Canada's communist

(The following article is from the September 1-15, 2006 issue of People's Voice, Canada's leading communist newspaper. Articles can be reprinted free if the source is credited. Subscription rates in Canada: $25/year, or $12 low income rate; for U.S. readers - $25 US per year; other overseas readers - $25 US or $35 CDN per year.
Send to: People's Voice, 290A Danforth Ave., ON, M4K 1NC.)

The following is an excerpt from a Toronto Star article by Adam Mayers, August 17, 2006. Although the article contains a few of the usual anti-communist references common in the corporate media, it does pay tribute to one of the outstanding leaders of Canada's working class movement.

Although Tim Buck died in obscurity in Mexico in 1972 at the age of 82, in the 1930s and 1940s, he was never far from the front page, frightening premiers and prime ministers with an uncanny ability to bait the authorities, arouse public sympathy and hector for the communist cause. He was arrested many times during those years, but the most famous brush with the law was in 1931 when he was arrested, tried for sedition and jailed at Kingston Penitentiary.

During a riot at the prison in 1932, guards fired eight warning shots into Buck's cell to intimidate him, figuring he was behind the uprising, even though he was the only person in the block sitting quietly on his bed.

When it was later revealed what the guards had done, Buck was even more popular and upon his release in 1934, the crowd that met him at Union Station was the largest ever to turn out to greet anyone. Some 7,000 supporters mobbed him and according to reports of the day, men and women wept, cheered and sang, as he was carried in triumph through the streets.

Buck's story is largely unknown now, but generations ago he was front-page news. Short, quietly spoken and very well read, Buck was anything but the stereotype of a revolutionary. Though he was slavishly devoted to Soviet Communism long after other party faithful had become disillusioned, Pierre Berton once described him as looking more like a shoe salesman than a bearded, bomb-throwing Bolshevik.

British-born Buck became a Marxist early in life and came to Canada when he was 25. He was a machinist by trade and among the 13 men who presided at the founding of the Canadian Communist Party at a meeting in 1921 at a barn at Guelph - an event kept secret for three years.

He was an eloquent speaker and became party president in 1929, crisscrossing the country, undeterred by beatings from police and spectators alike. On his second visit to Guelph, students at the Ontario Agricultural College broke up his address and threw him into the Speed River. He was arrested twice in the United States, which no doubt raised his profile with his Russian masters. During one of his many visits to Moscow, Buck was acclaimed as the star pupil of the "Lenin School" where party organizers from all over the world were trained.

As party leader, he drew less than what he could earn as a machinist and never owned a car. He lived modestly in a house on Delaney Cres., south of Dundas St. W. and west of Dufferin St. with his wife and two children.

In the fall of 1931, he was involved in one of the most notable political trials of the era. It followed an undercover operation that had lasted several years and penetrated the Communist Party of Canada. He was charged with being part of a conspiracy to overthrow the federal government. In November, 1931, after testimony, which included an RCMP officer who had gone undercover to infiltrate the party, Buck and six other were imprisoned.

He was released in early 1934 as popular as ever and tried to lever that into political power. He ran unsuccessfully in the Winnipeg North riding for Parliament in 1935, although he captured about 25 per cent of the vote. He made a run for Toronto's old Board of Control in 1937 and collected 44,000 votes, just 254 votes short of victory. Buck continued to play cat-and-mouse with the authorities. At the start of World War II and the signing of the Russo-German Pact, the Communist Party was outlawed and Buck went undrground. He evaded capture and circulated pro-Soviet propaganda.

In 1966, Buck stepped down as party leader and in 1971 at a ceremony in Moscow, he received the Order of the 1917 Revolution, one of the Soviet Union's highest awards. That year, he suffered his first stroke and moved to Mexico, where he later died at the age of 82. A lifelong atheist, he was cremated.

Among the tributes expressing the sympathies to the Canadian people was one from the head of the Cuban Communist Party, none other than Fidel Castro.







sitemap